Donald Trump’s meeting with Russia, Erick Erickson is aware who leaked it.
By considering the report about President Trump’s disclosure of top-secret news a week ago, during an Oval Office meeting with Russian authorities, a few intellectuals rushed to question the first information announced by The Washington Post, however, one conservative blogger clarifies why the report should be considered important.
Erick Erickson, who is considered veteran when it comes to “Donald Trump” he said that he knew the origins of where the information about the meeting of the president came from.
“What differentiates this story for me, in this event, is that I know one of the origins. What’s more, the origin is overwhelmingly supportive of Donald Trump,and it may be present at the time of 2016 Campaign.Whatever the case may be, the President will not take any criticism, regardless of how lightly it is delivered. He doesn’t need any guidance, can’t be diverted, and it’s too vulnerable to give him any reply as an answer to the event,” Erickson said.
On a news channel Monday the expert Jesse Watters stated that the report from The Washington Post is totally false. “The Washington Post wasn’t right about Sean Spicer making it secret. They weren’t right about Rosenstein, the officer AG, resigned, Watters said.